Q Read United States vs. O'Malley on page 674 and answer the following question: Suppose that O'Malley had been licensed to remove the asbestos. Would the result have been different? Why or why not?
On account of United States versus O'Malley, The grantor, by excellence of the first bury vivos move and the activity of the privilege saved in the trust instrument to hold trust pay as a feature of the trust head, instead of dispense it, made a "move" of gathered pay inside the importance of §811(c)(1)(B)(ii). The "move" necessity of that arrangement was along these lines met, just as the prerequisite
